SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Raj) 300

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
G.M.Lodha, J.
Nathmal Dalichand - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan and Ors. - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 227 of 1978.
Decided On : 11-08-1980

The assessment of urban land tax under the Rajasthan Urban Land Tax Act, 1964, is applicable only to lands and buildings situated in urban areas, which are defined as municipalities or cantonments.

Headnote:

{'KEYWORD': 'Urban Land Tax', 'SUBJECT': 'Assessment of Urban Land Tax', 'ACT SECTION LIST': 'Rajasthan Urban Land Tax Act, 1964 (now Rajasthan Land and Buildings Tax Act, 1964), Sections 3, 2(6)(a), 2(7)'}

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, residents of village Rani Khurd, challenged the assessment of urban land tax on their properties under the Rajasthan Urban Land Tax Act, 1964, arguing that Rani Khurd was not an urban area as per the definition in the Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the population of Rani Khurd was less than 8,000 as per the 1971 census, and that the municipality constituted in Rani Khurd was illegal as it did not meet the population requirement under the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959.

Issues: Whether the lands and buildings in Rani Khurd were subject to urban land tax under the Rajasthan Urban Land Tax Act, 1964.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the definition of 'urban area' under the Rajasthan Urban Land Tax Act, 1964, required the area to be either a municipality or a cantonment, and that Rani Khurd was neither.

Final Decision: The court quashed the assessment notices and proceedings for the assessment of land and buildings tax under the Rajasthan Land and Buildings Tax Act, 1964, in respect of the petitioners' properties in Rani Khurd.

JUDGMENT

1. - These 14 writ petitions arise out of the assessment proceedings under the Rajasthan Urban Land Tax Act, 1964 which is now known as the Rajasthan Land and Buildings Tax Act, 1964 as amended by the Act, 1973 (hereinafter called as the Act of 1964).

2. Tne undisputed facts of these cases are as follows. All the 14 petitioners are the residents of village Rani Khurd of District Pali of Rajasthan. They have either been assessed or are sought to be assessed under the provisions of the above Act. The lands and buildings on which the tax has either been levied or is sought to be levied are admittedly in the area of Rani Khurd.

3. It is also not in dispute that this court by judgment in Ummed Singh v. State of Rajasthan (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 415 of 1977, decided on October 25, 1977) has held that the population of this village Rani Khurd as per the census report of 1971 was less than 8,000 because it was only 5653. It was also held that a municipality can be constituted under the provisions of Rajasthan Municipalities Act only when the population of such area, is not less than 8 000 inhabitants or if any specific reasons are given in the notification itself. It was also held that the notification issued under Sections 6 and 4 failed to give any such reasons.

4. On the, above factual position, this Court held that since the population to be taken into consideration for the purposes of Section 5 of the Municipalities Act, 1959 is that mentioned in the most recent census, according to definition contained in Sub-section (22) of Section 3 of the 1959 Act, only population of 1971 can be taken into consideration. Since it was only 5653, and because no reasons were given under notifications under Sections 4 and 6 of the Act, for departing from legal mandate, the constitution of the municipality at Rani Khurd was illegal. It was also held that the Government was therefore, justified in declaring that the said local area was a Panchayat, and, therefore, the conversion of the Municipality in Gram-panchayat at Rani Khurd was justified and legal.

5. Mr. Sishodia, the learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State has conceded that no appeal has been filed against the judgment of the Single Bench of this Court, and that judgment has become final.

6. In view of the above undisputed facts the buildings and lands of the petitioners, which are in village Rani Khurd cannot be treated as situated in an Urban area, as is required by Section 3 of the Act. Section 3 of the Act is as under:

Section 3-Levy of urban land tax: (1) subject to the other provisions contained in this Act, there shall be levied and collected for each year a tax on urban lands, from every owner of urban land, at such rate not exceeding 2% of the market value of such urban land as determined under Section 4, as the State Government may by notification in the official Gazette declares in this respect.

Provided that the State Government may fix graduated rates of tax on different slabs of market value of urban lands.

Provided further that no tax shall be levied on any urban land if the owner thereof or his predecessor in interest has acquired such land by transfer from the Government or any local authority within a period of two years immediately preceding the year for which the tax is levied.
The definition of Urban Area is contained in Sub-clause (7) of Section 1 which is as under:

Section 2(7)-'Urban Area' means a Municipality or cantonment as the case may be.

7. The Municipality has been defined in sub-clause (6)(a) of Section 2 of the Act which as under:-

Section 2(6)(a)-'Municipality' means any local area which is at the commencement of the Rajasthan Urban Land Tax (Amendment) Act, 1973, a Municipality, and any area which may hereafter be constituted a Municipality, under Section 4 of the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959 (Rajasthan Act 38 of 1957).

8. It would thus be seen that the lands and buildings situated in Rani Khurd are not in urban area because they are





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top