SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Raj) 677

GYAN SUDHA MISRA
Ashfak Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
State And Two Others – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Praveen Balwada, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Miss Deepa Ajwani, Dy. G.A.

JUDGMENT

1. - This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the payment of 31,927.75 ps. which was payable to the petitioner's father on account of his death which became due to him under the State Insurance Scheme for which he had made contribution, upto 24th April, 1982. It appears that the Director, State Insurance and General Provident Fund Department, Rajasthan at Jaipur has issued a letter dated 21.6.1986 to the Chief Medical and Health Officer, Sikar, Rajasthan, intimating that Shri Mustak Ahmmed, Male Nurse, whose Provident Fund Account No. is 354339, could not be made the payment of Rs. 31,927.75ps, in absence of the relevant information regarding the deceased employee due to which the amount was transferred in the 'unpaid' account.

2. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was a minor at the time of the death of his father and therefore, was not aware enough to claim the amount. Even otherwise, the information regarding payment of such amount was sought from the Chief Medical Officer and it was his duty to furnish all the relevant information. The petitioner has therefore, suffered on account of the latches of the depa






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top