1995 Supreme(Raj) 708
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
M.P.Singh, J.
Umesh Sharma - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan And Ors. - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5156 of 1994.
Decided On : 31-01-1995
For the Petitioner:Dalip Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent:M.M. Ranjan, Ajeet Bhandari, L.L. Jain and S.B. Vaish, Advocates.
A deemed university, such as BITS, is not a "technical institution" as defined under the All India Council of Technical Education Act, 1987, and therefore, it is not subject to the AICTE's regulations.
Headnote:
ALL INDIA COUNCIL OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION ACT, 1987 - SECTION 10(K) - UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION ACT, 1956 - SECTION 2(F) - ADMISSION TO TECHNICAL INSTITUTIONS - JURISDICTION OF ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION - BIRLA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & SCIENCE, PILANI - DEEMED UNIVERSITY - NOT A TECHNICAL INSTITUTION - ADMISSION PROCEDURE - NOT SUBJECT TO AICTE REGULATIONS.
Fact of the Case:
Petitioner sought admission to an Engineering Degree Course based on the Pre-Engineering Test, 1994, conducted by the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE). The Birla Institute of Technology & Science, Pilani (BITS), was included in the list of institutes for which the test was held. The petitioner appeared in the test and secured 672 marks out of 900, but his merit position was 1006, and admissions were closed at position 762. BITS had already conducted its own admission process and finalized admissions by the beginning of August 1994. The petitioner challenged the inclusion of BITS in the centralized admission process, arguing that BITS was a deemed university and not subject to AICTE regulations.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the AICTE did not have jurisdiction to conduct the entrance test for admission to BITS. The court found that BITS was a deemed university under the University Grants Commission Act, 1956, and therefore, it was not a "technical institution" as defined under the All India Council of Technical Education Act, 1987. The court also noted that BITS had its own admission procedure and was not bound by the guidelines issued by the AICTE.
Issues: 1. Whether the AICTE had jurisdiction to conduct the entrance test for admission to BITS? 2. Whether BITS was a "technical institution" as defined under the All India Council of Technical Education Act, 1987?
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the definitions of "technical institution" and "university" under the All India Council of Technical Education Act, 1987, and the University Grants Commission Act, 1956, respectively. The court held that BITS was a deemed university and therefore, it was not a "technical institution" subject to the AICTE's regulations. The court also noted that BITS had its own admission procedure and was not bound by the guidelines issued by the AICTE.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition, holding that the petitioner was not entitled to admission in BITS based on the Pre-Engineering Test conducted by the AICTE.
JUDGMENT
1. - The petitioner is seeking admission in Engineering Degree Course on the basis of Pre-Engineering Test, 1994 through this writ petition.The Coordinator Pre-Engineering Test, 199 Mohan Lal Sukhadia University, Udalpur, (respondent No. 2) issued a notification which was published in the Rajasthan Patrika dated 6th August, 1994, for admission in Engineering Degree Course. It was a combined test for as many as 35 Institutes in Rajasthan. The name of Birla Institute of Technology & Science, Pilani, Rajasthan, (respondent No. 4) was also included in the said list.
2. The petitioner appeared in the Test. He secured 672 marks out of 900. The merit list was notified. In general category, merit position No. 1 to 762 and in the reserve list merit position Nos. 763 to 912 were notified. The petitioner's merit position was 1006. The candidates whose names appeared in the merit list upto 762 were called for interview on different dates and given admissions. There was no question of considering the petitioner for admission, as his position in the merit list was 1006. He has been rightly denied admission.
3. The Birla Institute of Technology & Science had already issued its own notification for admission. The last date for making applications was 30th June, 1994. All the admissions have been finalised by the beginning of August, 1994. The petitioner was not entitled to get admission in this Institute under any circumstance.
4. Apart from it in the merit list he stood at serial No. 1006 where as the admissions have been closed in all the Institutes of Rajasthan at serial No. 762. The writ petition deserves dismissal only on this ground.
5. Since the counsel for both of parties have argued at length, on the interpretation of relevant provisions of All India Council of Technical Education Act, 1987 (for short 'the 1987 Act') and University Grants Commission Act, 1956 (for short 'the 1956 Act'), the discussion has become inevitable, though it is only of academic value.
6. The sole question which remains to be decided in this case is whether the All India Institute of Technical Education Council has any jurisdiction to hold entrance test for admission in the Birla Institute of Technology & Science (respondent No. 4).
7. The 1987 Act was enacted for the establishment of an All India Council for Technical Education with a view to the proper planning and co-ordinated development of the technical education system throughout the country, the promotion of qualitative improvements of such education in relation to planned quantitative growth and the regulation and proper maintenance of norms and standards in the technical education system and for matters connected therewith.
8. The Council is established under Section 3 and its functions are contained in Section 10, according to which it is the duty of the Council to take all such steps as its thinks fit for ensuring co-ordinated integrated development of technical education and maintenance of standards and for the purposes of performing its functions under this Act, the Council may under sub-section (k) grant approval for starting new technical institutions and for introduction of new courses or programmes in consultation with the agencies concerned. It is empowered under Section 10(0) to provide guidelines for admission for students to technical institutions and Universities imparting technical education.
9. Technical Institutions' have been defined in Section 2(h), which runs as follows:
"Technical Institution:"as an institution, not being a University, which offers courses or programmes of technical education, and shall include such other institutions as the Central Government may, in consultation with the Council, by notification in the official Gazette, declare as technical institutions.
Section 2(1) defines "University", which runs as follows:
"University" - means a University defined under clause (f) of Section 2 of the University Grants Commission Act, 1956 and includes an institution deemed to
Click Here to Read the rest of this document