SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Raj) 240

M.L.JOSHI
Mahadeo Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - This is a very unfortunate case where although the petitioner has retired on March 19, 1974, yet his lien has not yet been determined by the Government till date.

2. The facts which are relevant for the disposal of this case stated in brief are as follows :

The petitioner in the present case was initially appointed as Vernacular Clerk in the former Jaipur State with effect from Sept 2, 1938. Thereafter the petitioner came to hold various posts which need not be mentioned here, as I do not think them relevant for the disposal of this petition. When the former Jaipur Stale was merged in the State of Rajasthan, the petitioner was transferred as Personal Assistant to the Hon'ble Premier, as he was designated then, and was appointed as Office Superintendent with effect from November 3, 1949 after having been selected by a Screening Committee consisting of the Chief Secretary and the Principal Private Secretary to the then Premier. The petitioner worked as an Office Superintendent in the Secretariat from November 3, 1949 to October 27, 1952 and was put in the grade of Rs. 125-10-225-EB-15-350 in the Unified Pay Sca1e Rules, 1950 and was also given two increments in the years















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top