1977 Supreme(Raj) 370
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
M.L.Jain, J.
Pukh Raj and others - Appellant
Versus
The Addl. Collector, Pali and Others - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1147 of 1972.
Decided On : 12-10-1977
Advocates:
For the Petitioner: H.M. Parekh and K.C. Samdaria, Counsel.
For the Opposite side : None.
Panchayats have the authority to construct and maintain public drains and remove encroachments on public ways or drains, but this authority does not extend to private property. Disputes involving easement rights on private property fall outside the jurisdiction of Panchayats.
Headnote:
PANCHAYAT ACT - SECTION 24(1), 26 - PUBLIC DRAINS - EASEMENT RIGHTS - JURISDICTION OF PANCHAYAT - CONSTRUCTION OF SOAK PITS - INTERPRETATION OF STATUTORY PROVISIONS - COURT'S ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION.
Fact of the Case:
Residents of Muthaji-ki-pol complained to the Gram Panchayat about increased water consumption and discharge of filthy water by residents of the area, causing nuisance and health hazards. The Panchayat directed the residents to construct soak pits, but they objected, claiming that the water had been passing through their houses since time immemorial. The Panchayat and Panchayat Samiti upheld the residents' objection, but the Additional Collector directed the construction of soak pits, holding that the Panchayat had no right to construct or allow drains to pass over private property.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the dispute was not related to a public drain under the jurisdiction of the Panchayat but involved easement rights of the residents, which fell outside the Panchayat's jurisdiction. The Additional Collector had correctly determined that the Panchayat had no authority to direct the construction of soak pits on private property.
Issues: 1. Whether the Panchayat had the authority to direct the construction of soak pits on private property. 2. Whether the Additional Collector erred in deciding the case without remanding it to the Panchayat Samiti for a fresh hearing with proper notice to the residents.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court interpreted sections 24(1) and 26 of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1963, which empower Panchayats to construct and maintain public drains and remove encroachments on public ways or drains. However, the court held that these provisions did not extend to private property, and the dispute in this case involved easement rights, which were beyond the Panchayat's jurisdiction. 2. The court found that the Additional Collector had not committed any error of jurisdiction or law apparent on the face of the record. While the Panchayat Samiti's order may have suffered from a defect of violating principles of natural justice, the Additional Collector's order did not, and he was within his power to decide the case himself.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition, holding that the Additional Collector had not committed any error of jurisdiction or law apparent on the face of the record and that the dispute fell outside the Panchayat's jurisdiction.
JUDGMENT
1. - The facts of this petition are that respondents Harishchandra Mehta and others made an application on 20.7.1969 to the Gram Panchayat, Khimel, that since the fitting of water pipes, the residents of Muthaji-ki-pol have increased the consumption of water and are discharging filthy water in large measure which collects in front of their house and has created nuisance, that residents may be directed to construct soak pits the petitioners Pukhraj and others in reply to the notice issued by the Panchayat contended that the discharge of water from their houses passes by the same passege since times immemorial. Harishchandra and others have raised a wall of soil thereby disallowing the water to pass & causing mud. The members of the panchayat thereupon went on the site date on August 3, 1969 and noted that one such wall was raised by Pukhrajji and Sheshmalji Sons of Dhulaji, at other was raised in front of the house of Dhanraj s/o Umaid Mal, 3rd one' was outside the house of Pukhraj s/o Dhulaji and the 4th one was in front of the house of Pukhraj s/o Magnaji. These walls were found to have been raised by Harishchandra s/o Bagtawar Chand. By the raising of these barriers water has started collecting in the Gali, even approaches to the houses have become difficult. Mosquitoes have appeared Danger is also there to the walls of the adjoining houses. Panchayat therefore, directed that the aforesaid walls should be removed by Harijans of the Panchayat and Harishchardra and others be directed not to raise such walls in future. Again on 5.7.70, the Panchayat took a decision that it was not possible to construct soak pits and the water should be allowed as usual to pass through the house of Harshchands etc. They were directed to remove the wall and refrain from raising any obstruction in future.
2. When appeal was filed in the Patchayat Samiti, it by its order on 29-12-1970 cancelled the order of the Panchayat because it found that rain water alone used to pass through the house of' the appellants Harishchandra and Pukhraj and the filthy discharge increased on account of water supply cannot be directed to pass through their houses. The Panchayat should acquire the land if it desires that the filthy water should pass through the houses of Harishchandra and others.
3. The petitioners thereupon filed a revision before the Collector, Pali. The Additional Collector who decided the appeal found that the appeal was heard by the Panchayat Samiti without notice to the respondents. But he held that since the introduction of the water supply, the discharge of water has increased and water has begun to be collected in the pol. The respondents could not allow such water to pass through their land. He also disagreed with the decision of the village Panchayat and directed that the aggrieved persons should construct soak pits as the village Panchayat cannot create drains upon personal property of others. This order of the Additional Collector is dated 29-7-72.
4. Aggrieved by this order the present petition has been filed. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the Additional Collector, Pali, has committed an error apparent on the face of the record in not setting aside the order of the Panchayat Samiti dated 29-12-70 which order the Panchayat Samiti passed in contravention of principles of natural justice. The petitioners pray that the orders of the Additional Collector and Panchayat Samiti be quashed and the Panchayat Samiti be directed to hear the appeal after giving notice to the petitioners.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioners also invited my attention to sub-section (1) of section 24 of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1963 and the third schedule thereto. According to this provision, it is the duty of the Panchayat so far as the Panchayat funds at its disposal will allow, to make reasonable provision within panchayat circle in regard to the construction, maintenance and repairs of public streets, drains, bunds an
Click Here to Read the rest of this document