1979 Supreme(Raj) 299
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
K.D.Sharma, S.N.Deedwania, JJ.
Amra - Appellant
Versus
The State of Rajasthan - Respondent
D.B. Cr. Jail Appeal No. 635 of 1973.
Decided On : 21-04-1979
The Court reiterated the principles of evaluating evidence in criminal cases, emphasizing the importance of considering the totality of the evidence, including eye witness testimony, extrajudicial confessions, and other incriminating circumstances, to reach a just and accurate verdict.
Headnote:
CRIMINAL APPEAL - MURDER - SECTION 302 IPC - EYE WITNESSES' TESTIMONY - VOLUNTARY CONFESSION - EXTRAJUDICIAL CONFESSION - INCRIMINATING CIRCUMSTANCES - SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE - CONVICTION UPHELD.
Fact of the Case:
Appellant Amra was convicted of murdering his brother Mota by the Sessions Judge, Balotra. The prosecution case was that Amra gave axe blows to Mota, fatally injuring him and severing his head from the body. Amra made an oral confession of the crime to the village Sarpanch, Bhanwar Singh, and was arrested by the police. The Sessions Judge found the eye witnesses' testimony reliable and believed Amra's extrajudicial confession, convicting him under Section 302 IPC.
Finding of the Court:
The High Court upheld the conviction, finding that the prosecution had proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Amra caused fatal injuries to Mota with the intention to murder him. The Court found the eye witnesses' testimony credible and corroborated by Amra's extrajudicial confession and other incriminating circumstances, such as the recovery of a blood-stained Adayata and gold earrings from Amra.
Issues: 1. Whether the eye witnesses' testimony was reliable and sufficient to prove Amra's guilt. 2. Whether Amra's extrajudicial confession was admissible and reliable. 3. Whether the other incriminating circumstances corroborated the prosecution's case.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court found the eye witnesses' testimony reliable, noting that they were close relations of Amra and had no motive to depose falsely against him. Their presence at the scene of the occurrence was natural, and their testimony was corroborated by various circumstances. 2. The Court held that Amra's extrajudicial confession to the village Sarpanch was admissible and reliable, as it was made voluntarily and under the shock and gravity of his crime. 3. The Court found that the other incriminating circumstances, such as the recovery of a blood-stained Adayata and gold earrings from Amra, further corroborated the prosecution's case.
Final Decision: The High Court dismissed Amra's appeal, upholding his conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC.
JUDGMENT
1. - Convict Amra preferred, this appeal against the judgment of the Sessions Judge, Balotra, dated 28th April, 1973, whereby he was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment & a fine of Rs. 200/-, in default of which, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two months, under Section 302 Indian Penal Code By the same judgment, however, accused Deda was acquitted of the offences under Section 302/34, 379 IPC.
2. The prosecution case was as under: In the noon of 5-7-72, deceased Mota was ploughing his field with the help of his nephew Banka. PW 4 Mst. Kohli was clearing the field at a distance of 15 to 20 steps. Appellant Amra was also ploughing his field at a distance of 15 to 20 steps. Deda came there & asked Mota that he should go with him to Amra & compromise the dispute with regard to their fields. When Mota reached near Amra, the latter gave axe blows to the former. Mota was fatally injured and his head was severed from the body. Amra, Mota and Deda were brothers. After the incident, Amra went to PW 5 Bhanwar Singh, Sarpanch of the village, and made an oral confession of the crime. Bhanwarsingh advised appellant Amra to go to the police. On the same night, Devilal, Head Constable Police Out Post, Band came across Amra in the precinct of village Shobhala. The Head Constable took Amra to the place of the incident, where he found 15 to 20 persons and the dead body of Mota. The Head Constable made arrangements to safeguard the deadbody and also kept Amra in his custody. He was informed that Heera and Deda had left for Police Station, Guda-Malani. Deda reached P.S. Guda-Malani on the next day in the morning and reported the matter orally to Himmat Singh (PW 8), S.H.O. of the Police Station at about 10 AM The S.H.O. recorded the First Information Report, registered the case and started the investigation. He reached the scene of occurrence and inspected the site and prepared the Memo (Ex. P. 2) and site plan (Ex. P. 7). He took possession of the dead body. He also recovered the shirt (Ex 4), Adayata (Ex. 5), towel (Ex. 6) and Pagarkhi (Ex. 7) from the dead body. He also seized the blood stained earth and the controlled sample of earth The SHO arrested appellant Amra vide Ex. P. 5 in presence of the witnesses. He also recovered from Amra, an axe (Ex. 1) and a pair of golden-ear-rings (Ex 2) He also seized a covering cloth (Adayata) belonging to Amra vide Ex. P. 4. Blood stained articles were duly sealed and sent to the Chemical Examiner Jaipur. During the investigation, amongst others, the statements of PW 4 Mst. Kohli, PW 7 Banka (eye witnesses) and PW. 6 Bhanwar Singh Sarpanch of the village were recorded. PW 2 Dr. Bhanwarlal preformed the authopsy and prepared the post mortem report Ex,P. 1. After completing the investigation, a challan under Section 302 Indian Penal Code was presented only against Amra in the court of Munsif Magistrate, Banner. The Munsif Magistrate, after recording the evidence, also took cognizance under Section 302/34 Indian Penal Code against Deda and committed him and Amra to the court of Sessions Judge, Balotra. The learned Sessions Judge was of the opinion that the eye witnesses could not be believed with regard to Deda and therefore, acquitted him. Regarding Amra, the learned Sessions Judge was of the opinion that both the eye witnesses were reliable and their statements were sufficient to prove beyond doubt offence under Section 302 Indian Penal Code against him. The learned Sessions Judge was further of the opinion that Amra voluntarily made true oral confessions of the crime to PW 2 Bhanwar Singh, Sarpanch of the village.
3. We have heard the learned Counsel for the appellant & the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and have gone through the record of the case cart fully.
4. It was not disputed that deceased Mota died of fatal injuries. P. W. 2 Doctor Bhanwarlal found the following injuries on the dead body of Mota.
1. An incised wound 10" x 3" x 11/2" deep over the left glutial region exte
Click Here to Read the rest of this document