SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Raj) 455

S.N.DEEDWANIA
Noor Mohammed & Anr – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajastha – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:P.L. Choudhary, Advocate.
For the State: Trilok R. Rathi, APP.

JUDGMENT

1. - Appellants Noor Mohammed and Gul Mohammad have preferred this appeal against the judgment of Sessions Judge, Bikaner, dated February 7, 1975 convicting and sentencing each of them under Section 366 Indian Penal Code to rigorous imprisonment for six months and a fine of Rs 50/-, in default of payment of which further rigorous imprisonment for 15 days. They were also convicted and sentenced under section 341 IPC. to rigorous imprisonment for two months. The sentences were to run concurrently.

2. The prosecution case was this Lalkhan resident of village Gulam wala has to daughters Fatti and Ajmat aged 13 and 10 years respectively. On 20.12 1973 Fatti and Ajmat were in their field. Lalkhan and his wife had gone to another field in village Jodasar. In the evening the two appellants came to the field of Fatti and Ajmat and told them their father was calling them.He would come to their appellants 'dhani' in the evening. Appellants came on a camel. Ajmat and Fatti believed the appellants and went with them to their field. Lalkhan returned to his field in the evening at about sunset and did not find his daughters. Hussainkhan is the son-in-law of Lalkhan. His field is in the ne


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top