SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 1796

SANGEET LODHA
Virendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Virendra Kuma – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:R.K. Bohra, Advocate.
For the State: Ashok Prajapat, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. - This criminal miscellaneous petition is directed against order dated 6.6.1012 of Additional Sessions Jude (F.T.) No. 1, Hanumangarh, whereby a revision petition preferred byte petitioner herein against the order dated 5.5.2012 of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Hanumangarh in Criminal Case No. 572/07 refusing to convert standing arrest warrant into bailable warrant, stands rejected as not maintainable.

2. The respondent No. 2 filed a complaint under section 138/142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (in short "the Act") against the petitioner the learned Trial Court took cognizance for offence under section 138 of the Act and summoned the petitioner. Despite service of the summon, the petitioner did not appear before the Trial Court and therefore, vide order dated 11.6.2009, he was summoned by arrest warrant. On account of non-service of the arrest warrant on the petitioner, vide order dated 2.4.2012, the Trial Court declared the petitioner absconder and while issuing standing arrest warrant, initiated proceedings under sections 82 and 83, Criminal Procedure Code against him.

3. The petitioner preferred an application under section 70 (2), Criminal Procedure Code b






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top