SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Raj) 1830

DINESH MAHESHWARI
Tej Raj – Appellant
Versus
Mohan Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:N.K. Rastogi, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Sangeeta Lodha, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - This Civil Misc. Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act has been preferred by the claimant against the award dated 20-8-1996 passed by the Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Pratapgarh in Claim Case No. 60/1992 whereby the claim application for compensation in relation to damage to the property was disallowed.

2. Brief facts relevant for the present purpose are that the claimant submitted a claim application seeking an amount of Rs. 19070/- as compensation against the non-applicants with the averments that on 2-7-1989 at about 5.30 p.m. driver of his bus bearing registration No. RJH- 2961 was driving the bus from Pratapgarh to Chhoti Sadri carrying conductor of the vehicle and so also the passengers. At Jnakhamiya Bridge, because of the cattle, the vehicle was stopped then Mohan Singh driver of the bus bearing registration No. RRB-6958 came driving the bus in a high speed rashly and negligently and hit the applicant's bus RJH-2961 on the rear side which resulted in breaking of the ladder, two glasses and substantial dent on the rear side. The applicant detailed out the expenses incurred by him in the repairs and so also other losses and claimed an amoun

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top