SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Raj) 183

D.P.GUPTA
Banshi Dhar Bohra – Appellant
Versus
The State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - These three petitions arise in similar circumstances and raise identical question and, therefore, they are disposed of by a common, order.

2. The petitioner in writ petitions No. 358 of 1971 and No. 1526 of 1971 is the same person, Banshidhar Bona, while writ petition No. 362 of 1971 has been filed by Bhawani Singh Chauhan. Both these petitioners were appointed as Assistant Mining Engineers (Survey) in temporary capacity and the period of their temporary employment was extended from time to time, subject to the condition that the same was liable to be terminated earlier in case persons duly selected by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission) were appointed on the aforesaid posts. The Commission advertised the posts of Assistant Maning Engineers & respondents Nos. 3 to 8, in writ petitions Nos. 353 and 1526 of 1971 (sic) selected for such posts by the Commission in the month of December, 1970. A (sic) result of the aforesaid selection, the services of the both the petitioner were terminated by the order of State Government dated January 27, 1971 with effect from April 30, 1971. Writ Petition No. 358 of 1971 was filed by Banshi





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top