SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Raj) 189

M.L.SHRIMAL
Bachha Raj – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:N.M. Singhvi, Advocate.
For the State: M.R. Bhansali, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. - The accused-appellant was employed as a cashier in the Polytechnic Institution, Jodhpur run by the Government of Rajasthan, On internal checking it was revealed on May 28 1970 that an embezzlemeat of Rs. 3760/- was committed by the accused-appellant. On May, 30, 1970 the Principal of the Polytechnic, Jodhpur Shri S.N. Goyal (PW 1) lodged a report Ex, P 14 at Police Station, Sardarpura. Jodhpur, The Police after usual investigation submitted a challan against the accused in the Court of Additional Munsiff Magistrate No. 1, Jodhpur, who committed the accused to the Court of Sessions Judge, Jodhpur who transferred the same to the Court of Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, jodhpur. The appellant was tried by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Jodhpur for offences under Section 409 and 477A IPC Prior to the date of conviction the accused deposited an amount of Rs. 3134,10 paisa as admitted by P.W.1 Shri S.N. Goyal. The learned Judge after taking into consideration the fact of payment of the amount and appreciating the evidence led by both the parties convicted the accused appellant under Section 109 IPC and sentenced him to two years' rigorous imprisonment and a f














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top