1. - This revision petition has been tiled against the order dated 14.05.2012 passed by the learned Special Judge (Women Atrocities and Dowry Cases), Jaipur City, Jaipur whereby charges have been framed against the present petitioner.

2. The short facts of the case are that Poonam Kumari filed written report at Police Station Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur, which was registered as FIR No.289/2011 for the offences under Section 376 read with Sections 511, 292 and 341 IPC and Section 4/6 of Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 and Section 67 of the I.T.Act against the present petitioner and other co-accused. After usual investigation, the police filed charge-sheet against the present petitioner for the above offences and against co-accused under Section 354 IPC. The case was committed to the Court of Sessions and the present petitioner has been charged as above.

3. The contention of the present petitioner is that charges under Section 376 read with Section 511 IPC and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act are not made out by the bare perusal of the evidence available on record. There is no allegation of the prosecutrix that present petitioner has attempted to