SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Raj) 1649

H.R.PANWAR
Amar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Basti Chand Bhansali, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Rameshwar Dave, Dy. G.A.

JUDGMENT

1. - By the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to grant him second selection grade in pursuance of the Circular dated 25.1.1992 and also seeks quashing of the order Annexure 2 dated 3.6.2004 issued by the respondent No. 3.

2. I have heard learned Counsel for the parties.

3. It is contended by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the respondent State issued a Circular dated 25.1.1992, para 4 of which provides that the second selection grade, wherever admissible in terms of this Circular, shall be the pay scale of second promotional post available to that employee in the same service/cadre, provided that In case there is no second promotional post in the same service/cadre or the employee does not possess the requisite academic qualification prescribed for the promotion and in respect of isolated post, the second selection grade shall be the pay scale corresponding to the existing pay scale, i.e. the pay scale (pay scale of the post held or the selection scale) as specified in paragraph 5 and, therefore, the petitioner submits that the second selection grade admissible in terms of the







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top