SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Raj) 153

M.L.SHRIMAL
Kishan Bai – Appellant
Versus
Pooran – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - This is an appeal by the legal representatives of the defendant-tenant Harishanker since deceased.

2. It arises out of a suit for eviction filed by the plaintiff landlord to the Court of Additional Munsiff Magistrate No. 3, Kota. The suit was originally filed against Harishanker. The suit for ejectment was based on the ground of reasonable bonafide personal necessity of the landlord. The suit was dismissed by the trial court on April 10, 1969 An appeal was preferred by the landlord which was transferred to the Additional Civil Judge No. 1, Kota and the same was registered as Civil Appeal No. 12/1973 During the pendency of the appeal the defendant Harishanker died. The surviving heirs, in accordance with law were brought on the, record as legal representatives in the case. The appellate court held that the legal representatives of the respondent before that that court were not entitled to the protection of the provisions of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as "Act No. 17 of 1950) The law on this point stood well settled by a decision of their Lordships of the Supreme Court in J.C. Chatterjee and Ors. v. Shri Sri K




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top