SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 2120

RAGHUVENDRA S.RATHORE
Malli Devi @ Sakuntala – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:M.K. Kaushik, Advocate.
For the Respondent No. 2:Piyush Kumar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - By this revision petition, filed by the accused, challenge has been made to the order dated 25.07.2012 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rajgarh District Alwar, in Sessions Case No.6/2012. whereby he has framed charges against him for the offences under sections 498-A and 304-B IPC and in the alternative under section 302 IPC.

2. The instant criminal case was initiated on a report lodged by one Hitrendra Pradhan on 28.10.2011 at police station Tahla District Alwar in relation to the death of his sister. The report was registered as FIR No. 139/2011 under sections 498-A and 304-B IPC. There-upon, the investigation commenced and after conclusion of the same challan came to be filed by the police in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajgarh District Alwar for the offences under sections 498-A and 304-B/302 IPC. Subsequently, the learned Magistrate committed the case to the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rajgarh for trial where it was registered as Sessions Case No.6/2012. Learned Additional Sessions Judge. Rajgarh, by his order dated 25.07.2012 (Annexure- 2) framed charges against the petitioners for the offences afore-mentione











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top