SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Raj) 175

D.P.GUPTA
Bhag Chand – Appellant
Versus
State Transport Appellate Tribunal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - Heard learned Counsel for the parties I am in complete agreement with the learned Member of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Rajasthan, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') that the petitioner committed gross and deliberate mis-representation in the present case and the grant of permit nude in favour of the petitioner was, therefore, rightly revoked by the Regional Transport Authority, Bikaner (hereinafter referred to as 'the RTA').

2. The petitioner applied for the grant of a non-temporary stage carriage permit on Bhadra-Bhatukala route and when his aforesaid application crime up for consideration before the RTA on May 5, 1975 the petitioner represented that he was a displaced operator and that he had a ready vehicle of 1962 model, bearing registration No. RJK 3554 Another applicant, Yaseen Khan also represented before the RTA that he had a ready vehicle of 1962 model. Applying a uniform standard that permits be granted to displaced operators owning ready vehicles, of permissible models, the RTA granted two permits, one each to the petitioner and Yaseen Khan and allowed them 60 days' time to obtain permits on vehicles of the prescribed model. The









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top