2013 Supreme(Raj) 576
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Sandeep Mehta, J.
Arjun Khatri - Appellant
Versus
M/s. Sweta Industries & Ors. - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 1161 of 2011.
Decided On : 11-01-2013
The main legal principle established is the importance of examining disputed documents by the State Forensic Science Laboratory to determine alleged forgeries or interpolations.
Headnote:
Forgery - Cheque - Examination by FSL
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the trial court's order dismissing the application to send the disputed cheque to the FSL for examination. The petitioner claimed that the cheque was forged with interpolations.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the accused had suggested in cross-examination that the words and numerals were added by misusing blank spaces, and upon perusal of the cheque, the court opined that the contention of the petitioner was not without basis. The court concluded that it was essential to have the cheque examined by the State Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) to determine the alleged interpolations.
Issues: The issue was whether the trial court was justified in rejecting the petitioner's request to send the cheque to the FSL for examination.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the accused's suggestion and the apparent viewing of the cheque, leading to the conclusion that examination by the FSL was essential to determine the alleged interpolations.
Final Decision: The misc. petition was allowed, and the trial court's order was quashed. The trial court was directed to transmit the cheque to the FSL for examination, with instructions to expedite the report.
JUDGMENT
1. - The instant misc. petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner challenging the order dated 14.1.2011 passed by the learned Special Judicial Magistrate (N.I. Act) Cases, Bikaner in complaint case No.2033/09 dismissing the application filed on behalf of the petitioner for sending the disputed cheque to the FSL for examination.
2. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has taken a specific plea in the court below that the cheque which was issued was only for a sum of Rs. 3,000/-, whereas, the complainant by misusing the empty spaces in the cheque added the words "one lakh" before the amount of rupees three thousand and the numerals "10" before the amount of Rs. 3000/- and thereby made interpolation in the cheque in question. The cheque (Ex.P 1-A) has been filed on the record for the perusal of the court.
3. Learned counsel submits that from the apparent viewing of the cheque itself, it is evident that forged interpolations have been made in the cheque and, therefore, the trial court was not at all justified in rejecting the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner for sending the cheque to FSL for examination by the Hand Writing Expert.
4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents have opposed the submissions made on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner.
5. Heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the order impugned as well as the disputed cheque and the statement of the complainant recorded at the trial.
6. The accused in his cross examination has given a specific suggestion to the complainant that the words one lakh and the numerals 10 were added in the cheque by misusing the blank spaces. From a perusal of the cheque also, this Court is of the opinion that the said contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is not without any basis. Therefore, it was absolutely essential for the trial court to have the cheque examined by sending it to the State Forensic Science Laboratory for giving its opinion as regards the alleged interpolations.
7. Resultantly, this misc. petition is allowed. The order dated 14.1.2011 passed by the learned Special Judicial Magistrate (N.I. Act) Cases, Bikaner is hereby quashed. The learned trial court is directed to forthwith transmit the cheque in question to the State Forensic Science Laboratory for examination in relation to the alleged interpolations as has been claimed by the petitioner in his application for sending the cheque to the Hand Writing Expert for examination. The trial court shall instruct the State Forensic Science Laboratory to send the report expeditiously.Petition allowed.
*******
Click Here to Read the rest of this document