SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Raj) 1075

MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Anachi Bai – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Manoj Bhandari, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Rajesh Panwar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - Since all these four appeals have been tiled against the judgment and award dated 22.1 1.2007 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, hence the arguments have been heard together and they are being decided by this common judgment.

2. Brief facts of the case are that on 24.8.2003 at about 2.00 p.m., the claimants were going in Jeep No. M.H.-04-A.Y.-3425 from Mumbai to Nasik . When they were passing through the border of village Kasara, a truck appeared in front of jeep. The driver of the jeep drove the jeep rashly and negligently and hit the truck at its wrong side, as a result of which the claimants sustained injuries on their bodies.

3. F.I.R. was lodged. Claim Petition Nos. 165/2004, 166/2004, 167/2004 and 168/2004 were filed. Notices were issued, issues were framed, reply was filed and after hearing both the sides, the learned Tribunal decreed an amount of Rs. 1,42,000/- in Claim Petition No. 165/2004; Rs. 3,48,000/- in Claim Petition No. 166/2004 ; Rs. 1,05,000/- in Claim Petition No. 167/2004 ; and Rs. 2,15,000/- in Claim Petition No.- 168/2004 in favour of claimants and against the non-claimants.

4. Against the aforesaid judgment and award, the insurance company








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top