Tapeshwar @ Chhotu vs The State of Rajasthan

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2004 Supreme(Raj) 1735

SUNIL KUMAR GARG, AJAY RASTOGI
Tapeshwar @ Chhotu – Appellant
Versus
The State of Rajasthan – Respondent

For the Accused Appellant:Babulal Saini and Ranvir Singh, Advocates.
For the Parties: M.L. Goyal, P.P.

JUDGMENT

1. - This appeal has been filed by the accused appellant against the judgment and order dated 8.8.2003 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST Cases, Kota in Sessions Case No. 53/95 by which he while acquitting the accused appellant for the offence under Sections 326, 326/34 IPC and 3(2)(5) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the SC/ST Act.), convicted the accused appellant for the offence under Sections 302/34, 307/34 and 324 IPC and 4/25 Arms Act and sentenced him in the following manner:-

Name of appellant

Convicted u/s

Sentence awarded

Tapeshwar & Chhotu

302/34 IPC

Imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo SI for six months.

307/34 IPC

Ten years RI and to pay fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo SI for six months.

324 IPC

One year RI and to pay fine of Rs. 1000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo SI for three months.

4/25 Arms Act

One year SI and to pay fine of Rs. 200/-, in default of paymen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2004 Supreme(Raj) 1735

SUNIL KUMAR GARG, AJAY RASTOGITapeshwar @ Chhotu – AppellantVersusThe State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Cases Referred (4)

SUNIL KUMAR GARG, AJAY RASTOGI
Tapeshwar @ Chhotu – Appellant
Versus
The State of Rajasthan – Respondent