SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Raj) 1314

MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Om Prakash Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Satya Narain – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Nitin Jain, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Ved Prakash Saini, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - The complainant Om Prakash, partner of Rajasthan Yarn and Dan Udyog, filed criminal leave appeal to appeal under section 378 (4), Cr. P. C. against the judgment of acquittal dated 2.2.99 passed by CJM Tonk in criminal case No. 301 of 1995 whereby the accused respondent was acquitted of the offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. This court issued notice of the criminal leave petition to the respondent and the same was served upon him and he put in appearance through his counsel before this court. The application for criminal leave to appeal was allowed by this court on 23.5.2002 after hearing both the parties and the same was registered as Criminal Appeal No. 691 of 2002.

2. Brief facts giving rise to this appeal is that the complainant filed a criminal complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable instruments Act before the Judicial Magistrate Tonk wherein it was alleged that the complainant is doing a business in the name of Rajasthan Yarn and Dari Udyog. The accused gave a cheque No. 15.5.1995 for Rs. 22,000/- to him. The complainant deposited the said cheque in his bank on 17.5.1995 which was dishonored and received back with the remarks that t







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top