SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Raj) 859

AMITAVA ROY, V.K.MATHUR
Chand Mohammed – Appellant
Versus
Central Admn. Tribunal, Jodhpur – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:N.K. Khandelwal, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Sanjeet Purohit, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. In challenge is the judgment and order dated 23.5.2008 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur (for short herein referred to as 'the Tribunal') in O.A. No.116/2007 whereby the writ petitioners' assailment of the communication no.10210/HS/778/EIC 2 dated 21.5.2007 circulating amongst others panel of FGM, HS-I and HS-II (category of placement of Master Craftsman) had been negatived. Essentially thereby, the DB Civil Writ Petition No.7395/2008 Chand Mohammed & Anr. v. Central Admn. Tribunal, Jodhpur & Ors. writ petitioners perceived claim of seniority in Highly Skilled category (for short herein referred to as 'HS') in terms of the policy of restructuring engrafted in the letter dated 20.5.2003 (Annex.P/3) was declined.

3. The facts in brief necessary for the disposal of the instant petition are that the petitioners entered the service under the respondents as skilled workman on 18.1.1978 and 6.8.1971 respectively and were recruited as HS-II on 22.3.1995. While they continued to serve as such, the policy aforementioned for restructuring the cadre of artisans staff in the defence establishment was enfor
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top