2012 Supreme(Raj) 2332
VINEET KOTHARI
Dimple Soni – Appellant
Versus
Praven Kumar – Respondent
For the Petitioner:Vikram Choudhary, on behalf of the Mr. Rakesh Arora, Advocates.
For the Respondent: None present.
JUDGMENT
1. - None present for the respondent despite service,
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. The present transfer application has been filed by the petitioner Dimple Soni seeking transfer of Civil Misc. Case No. 62 of 2010. Praveen Kumar v. Smt. Dimple under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act pending in the Court of Additional District Judge, Nagaur.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner while submitted that transfer of proceedings is sought on the ground that Section 125 Cr.P.C. proceedings are pending at Bikaner and a complaint under Section 498A I.P.C. has been filed her at Bikaner and therefore, to facilitate the litigations between the parties in the present matrimonial dispute, the present case under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act deserves to be transferred from Nagaur to Bikaner. He submitted that the petitioner being lady, travel of 125 kms. from Bikaner to Nagaur cannot be undertaken by her and she has five years' old son. He has also submitted that the respondent-husband tried to snatch away the custody of the son at Bikaner, for which a F.I.R. was lodged by the petitioner at Bikaner on 8.9.2010 and therefore, looking to her security reason,
Click Here to Read the rest of this document