SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Raj) 786

NISHA GUPTA
Shankar Lal – Appellant
Versus
Ginni Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Akhilesh Kumar Saini, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - This Misc. Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 read with section 151 of CPC has been preferred against the order dated 24.4.2010 passed in Civil Misc. Case No. 13/09 (12/08) by the Addl. District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No. 3 Jhunjhunu (Head Quarter Nawalgarh) whereby the application filed under Order 39 Rule 2(a) has been rejected.

2. The short facts of the case are that the appellant plaintiff filed a suit for cancellation of sale deed in which an application for temporary injunction was also filed. After hearing the parties, the court below has ordered not to make any change in the disputed property and to maintain status quo but in spite of this order, the respondent started construction work after 13.11.2007. The present appellant moved an application under Order 39 Rule 2(a) of CPC and to prove his contention affidavit and evidence has also been produced in support of his application under Order 39 Rule 2(a) of CPC which has been rejected. Hence the present appeal.

3. The contention of the appellant is that it was amply proved before the court below that the respondent has committed disobedience of the order of temporary injunction , his application has been wrongl







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top