1. - By way of the instant writ petition, the petitioner Ladu has beseeched to quash and set-aside the judgment dated 4th November, 2008 (Annexure-4) and 7th April, 2011 (Annexure-6), rendered by the Rent Tribunal Tonk and Appellate Rent Tribunal, Tonk respectively.

2. The nub of the appellant's story is that the respondent-applicant Kishan Lal filed an application for eviction under Section 9 of the Rent Control Act, 2001 against the petitioner-non applicant on the ground of denial of title, personal necessity and default in payment of rent.

3. Having recorded the evidence led by both the parties and carefully perused the entire material on record, the learned Rent Tribunal decreed the suit of eviction in favour of the respondent-applicant and against the petitioner-non applicant. Aggrieved with the impugned judgment dated 4th November, 2008, the petitioner-non applicant preferred an appeal before the Appellate Rent Tribunal and the appeal filed by the petitioner non applicant also stood dismissed. Hence, this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner assailed both the judgments of the courts below on the ground that the Rent