SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Raj) 1630

R.S.CHAUHAN
Mohan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Brij Kanwar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Sanjay Verma, Advocate.
For the Respondent: None.

JUDGMENT

1. - The learned counsel for the petitioner has challenged the order dated 7.5.2010 passed by the Civil Judge (junior Division) and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Kekri, District Ajmer, whereby the learned Magistrate has rejected the application filed by the petitioner under Order 7, Rule 14 Civil Procedure Code read with Section 151 Civil Procedure Code for taking certain documents on record.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner had filed a suit against respondent No. 1 claiming therein that the petitioner had an ancestral property, situated in Khasra Nos. 301, 3102 and 3103, in Mohan Nagar, Kekri. It is further his contention that out of the ancestral property, certain plots were carved out and sold to different persons. However, Plot Nos. 29 and 30 were never sold to the husband of respondent No. 1, Smt. Braj Kanwar. On 2.9.2008, the learned trial Court framed issues. On 29.7.2009, the petitioner's evidence was closed. Subsequently, at the stage of final argument, the petitioner moved an application under Order 7, Rule 14 for taking a conversion order dated 23.10.1983 as well as "the Sajra" on record. However, vide order dated 7.5.2010, the learned





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top