SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Raj) 1483

R.S.CHAUHAN
Lali – Appellant
Versus
Ramkaran – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants:Mahendra Goyal, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Anil Poonia, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - With the consent of both the learned counsel for the parties, this case is being decided finally by this order.

2. The appellants have challenged the order dated 20th August, 2009 passed by the Additional District Judge, Sambhar Lake, District Jaipur, thereby the learned Judge had granted the application filed under Section 9 of the Guardians & Wards Act, 1890 and had directed that the custody of Kumari Sunita, the daughter of the appellant No. 1, should be given to the respondent, Ramkaran, her paternal grandfather.

3. Vide order dated 15.04.2010, this Court had directed the parties to appear before it along with Kumari Sunita. In pursuance thereof, the parties are present before this Court. This Court had an occasion to speak to Kumari Sunita in the Chamber. Kumari Sunita has stated before this Court that she wishes to live with her mother, the appellant No. 1, and with her maternal grand-parents. According to her, she was not only living their home, but she was also sent to school by them. She is eager to pursue her study. According to her, ever since the respondent has taken her to his house, initially he did not permit her to pursue her studies. Only subsequently,





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top