2010 Supreme(Raj) 1497
SANGEET LODHA
Gurnam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan Mahila Vidhyalaya Anr. – Respondent
Advocates:
For the Petitioners:Deelip Kawadia, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Muktesh Maheshwari, Advocate.
JUDGMENT
1. - This writ petition is directed against order dated 3.11.09 passed by the Rent Tribunal, Udaipur in Execution case no. 19/09, whereby an application preferred by the petitioners u/s 21 of the Rent Control Act, 2001 (in short "the Act") read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 ("CPC") praying for stay of the execution proceedings and revocation of the possession warrant, pending disposal of the objections raised on their behalf resisting the execution of certificate for recovery possession, stands rejected.
2. The respondent no.1 filed an application under Section 9 of the Act for eviction of its tenant M/s. Green Roadways from the commercial premises in question on the ground of reasonable and bona fide necessity. The firm M/s. Green Roadways was impleaded as party to the application through its partner Mr. Krishna Kumar Arora.
3. A reply to the application was filed on behalf of the firm by its partner Mr. Krishna Kumar Arora stating therein that the business of the firm is being carried out by a company established by Gurnam Singh and his brother Jora Singh, the petitioner no.1 & 4 herein and the rent of the premises is also being paid by them. However,
Click Here to Read the rest of this document