SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Raj) 1006

SANGEET LODHA
Pratapi – Appellant
Versus
Jhamku – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Moti Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Abhinav Jain, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - This revision petition is directed against order dated 13.2.2012 passed by the Additional District Judge, Nimbahera in Civil Suit No. 36/2008, whereby an application preferred by the petitioner/defendant under Order 7, Rule 11 of C.P.C. stands rejected.

2. The respondent/plaintiff preferred a suit inter alia against the petitioner/defendant for declaration, partition, cancellation of sale deed and permanent injunction in respect of agriculture land ad measuring 38 bighas 6 biswas comprising Khasra Nos. 191, 684, 724, 18 and 733 of revenue village Pipalwas. It is alleged that the said land was khatedari land of Hazari, the father of plaintiff-Sint. Jhamku, defendant No. 3-Shambhu and defendant No. 4- Shanker. The defendant No. 1-Pratapi, the petitioner herein, who is widow of elder brother of deceased Hazari sold one half portion of 6 bighas and 10 biwas land comprising Khasra No. 18 vide registered sale deed dated 24.1.2008 in favour of defendant No. 2-Smt. Shanti Bai. It is averred that the defendant No. 1, the petitioner herein, had no right whatsoever to sale the land inherited by the plaintiff, the respondent No. 1 herein, and his brothers Shambhu and Shanker, the






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top