1. - The petitioner-tenant has laid the present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for assailing the part of the order dated 11th May 2012 passed by the learned Appellate Rent Tribunal, Udaipur (for short, 'the Tribunal') whereby the learned Tribunal has rejected the application of the petitioner under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amendment of written statement.

2. By the impugned order, the learned Tribunal has decided two applications submitted on behalf of the petitioner- tenant. The application under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC for taking additional documents on record was allowed but the application for amendment in the pleadings was declined.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner-tenant Mr. Rajesh Shah has argued that having granted the indulgence to the petitioner-tenant on his application under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC, the learned Tribunal ought to have allowed the amendment in the written statement because those amendments were consequential. Mr. Shah has further submitted that the proposed amendment in the written statement was just and by seeking amendment the petitioner-tenant has made endevour to place on record certain subsequent events which hav