SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 2493

S.P.PATHAK
Sultan – Appellant
Versus
Aam Janta (General Public) of Village Bhankari – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Aditya Narain Sharma, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - This second appeal under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 13.8.2009 passed by the Additional District Judge (Fast Track) Bandikui, Head Quarter at Dausa District Dausa in Civil Appeal no. 8/2007 (32/2004) whereby the judgment and decree dated 5.8.2004 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dausa in Civil Suit No.91/2003 has been confirmed.

2. Briefly stated the facts for the disposal of the present second appeal are that the appellant was defendant in the suit filed by the respondents. In the suit a prayer was made by the plaintiff to grant permanent injunction and to restrain the defendant from creating hindrance in the use of the way which is passing through khasra nos. 274, 308 and 310 situated in village Bhankari, Tehsil and District Dausa. The learned trial court proceeded with the trial and on 11.12.2003 drew exparte proceedings against defendant nos. 2, 4 and 5 and also closed the right to file written statement in relation to defendant nos.1 and 3 in the suit as more than 90 days time was taken by the defendant in filing the written statement. On 7.1.2004, exparte proceedings were ordered aga








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top