SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 2540

R.C.GANDHI, MAHESH BHAGWATI
Jamuna Bai – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Sanjay Mehrishi, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Sonal Singh, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. 1. By virtue of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 22nd May, 2001 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jaipur, whereby the application under Section 19 of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act has been dismissed in exercise of the powers 'under Section 21 (1) (B) of the Act as being barred by limitation.

2. Dhanna Lal Mehar was working as Gangman in Western Railway, Rail Path Nirikshak, Ramganj Mandi, Kota. He died on 15.7.1972 while he was on duty. Widow of the deceased made several representations to the respondents for grant of pension, but of no avail. She ultimately filed a Suit before the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Division) and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, No. 1 (North), Kota, which came to be disposed of vide order dated 14.11.2000 with the direction that the plaintiff petitioner should approach the competent Court. Faced with this situation, the petitioner presented Original Application under Section 19 of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act before the Central Administrative Tribunal, respondent No. 4. The Tribunal appreciated the facts that Dhanna Lal died on 15.7.1972 and the petitioner has approach







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top