SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Raj) 1284

R.S.CHAUHAN
Paras Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Sandeep Saxena, Advocate.
For the Respondents:N.A. Naqvi, Addl. Advocate General.

JUDGMENT

1. - Aggrieved vide order dated 25-10-2002, whereby the Director Local Self Government had declared that the Screening Committee did not find the Junior Engineers, working in Municipal Boards eligible for regularisation, the petitioner has challenged the said order before this Court.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner had done his diploma in Civil Engineering from Polytechnic College, Ajmer. Initially, the petitioner was appointed as Junior Engineer (Civil) in Municipal Board, Jahajpur (Bhilwara) on daily wages basis on 28-6-1994. He worked there till 31-5-1995. From 1-6-1995 till 31-8-1995, he worked in Municipal Board Shahpura, District Bhilwara. Subsequently, he was appointed on daily wages basis on 1-11-1995 in Municipal Board Puskar. Thereafter, his services have been extended, from time to time, by respondent No.2, the Municipal Board, Puskar. The post of Junior Engineer (Civil) in Municipal Board, Puskar is a sanctioned post.

3. Considering the fact that a large number of Junior Engineers (Civil) were working in different Municipal Boards, throughout the state, vide Circular dated 25-1-1998, the Director Local Bodies invited applications from those

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top