1. - Heard learned counsel for the parties.The petitioner was transferred vide order dated 25.9.2009 from one place to another and in pursuance of that order dated 25.9.2009, the petitioner was relieved on 5.10.2009 and she joined the transferred place on 6.10.2009. The copies of order dated 25.9.2009, relieving order dated 5.10.2009 and joining report letter are placed on record as Annex.1, Annex.2 and Annex.3. The contention of the petitioner was that by antidated order dated 21.9.2009, the transfer order has been amended. It is also submitted that the transfer order has been amended to accommodate the respondent no.6 only.

2. The petitioner challenged the transfer order rather say the amended order dated 29.9.2009 treating that order to be order dated 21.9.2009, by preferring appeal before the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal vide order dated 3.10.2009 dismissed the petitioner's appeal after observing that the petitioner joined the duties in pursuance of the order dated 25.9.2009 whereas he is challenging the order dated 21.9.2009. In this writ petition again, the petitioner took the same plea that the transfer order dated 25.9.2009 was amended a