1. - By this writ petition a prayer has been made to direct the respondents to extend benefit of pension to the petitioner along with interest.

2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in option form petitioner had opted for pension, however, due to mala fide of the respondents, alterations were made in the option form, therefore, treating it to be a case of submission option for pension, respondents may be directed to extend necessary benefits as prayed for in the writ petition. For the aforesaid purpose, petitioner is ready to repay the amount of Contributory Provident Fund (CPF) so deposited in his account as it was not otherwise accepted by him thus lying in the bank account without withdrawal.

3. Learned counsel for respondents submit that option form submitted by the petitioner has no cuttings or over-writing, rather, original option form shows that option for CPF scheme has been filled, accordingly, from the year 1995 itself contribution towards CPF was deducted from the salary of the petitioner. He never made any objection to the aforesaid. It is for the first time that after retirement such an objection is made. Looking to the aforesaid, petitioner is not enti