1. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. It is a clear case of abuse of process of court in the name of writ petition for Quo Warranto. It is a clear case of abuse of process of law by taking benefit of the provisions of the Right to Information Act.

3. The facts which came out from the writ petition are that the petitioner is of the age of 66 years and is belonging to caste Suthar. According to the petitioner, he came to know about some forgery committed by the respondent no.6 in getting Government employment 37 years ago, in the year 1972, that too on the post of junior carpenter. According to the petitioner, the respondent no.6 is also of the caste of Suthar and is of the age of 67 years. The petitioner and respondent no.6 are both residents of Bikaner City. It has not been disclosed as to from when the petitioner is knowing the respondent no.6 but according to learned counsel for the petitioner, he came to know about the respondent no.6 in the year 2007 and immediately, he started looking into the service record of the respondent no.6 who was appointed in the year 1973 on the post of Junior Carpenter. The petitioner's efforts clearly reveal that he tried to sear