1. - Aggrieved by the order dated 26.11.2009, this revision petition has been filed.

2. Learned counsel appearing for appellant - Union of India submits that after completion of the prosecution evidence, accused was called for his statements under Section 313 of Cr.PC. The matter was thereafter kept for defence evidence. On 8.9.2009, 11.9.2009 and thereafter on 16.9.2009 time prayed for was granted for defence evidence. On 24.9.2009, defence evidence was closed on the prayer of accused non-petitioners. The matter was thereafter kept for final hearing. On 12.10.2009, the matter was heard and prosecution side completed its arguments, but defence prayed for time to argue the matter. On 15.10.2009, prosecution submitted their written arguments as they had completed their arguments on 12.10.2009 itself, the matter was thereafter deferred to 27.10.2009 followed by another date i.e. 4.11.2009. This was at the Instance of accused. On 7.11.2009 an application under Section 311 of Cr.P.C. was filed with a request that Principal of the School may be called along with attendance register as P.W.7 - Surendra Singh Rathore while disposing statements admitted that he was on duty in the sc