SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Raj) 1851

H.R.PANWAR
Prem Bhushan Soni – Appellant
Versus
Achar Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Niranjan Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Trilok Joshi, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - BY the instant criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C, the accused-petitioner has challenged the order dated 13-2-2007 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sri Karanpur (for short, "the Revisional Court" hereinafter) in Criminal Revision Petition No. 27/2006, whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioner against the order dated 18-5-2006 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Padampur (for short, "the Trial Court" hereinafter) was dismissed.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Carefully gone through the orders passed by both the Courts below.

3. It appears from the complaint filed by the respondent that the name of the Rajasthan Bank Ltd. has been mentioned, whereas the actual bank is Sri Ganganagar Central Cooperative Bank, Padampur Branch. However, subsequently during the trial of the case, an application was submitted mentioning therein that the name of the bank has not been correctly mentioned in the complaint and, therefore the name of Sri Ganganagar Central Cooperative Bank was sought to be substituted in place of the Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. That application was allowed. On revision, the Revisional Court did not interfere with the or





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top