2013 Supreme(Raj) 900
R.S.CHAUHAN
Kartar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Biri Singh Sinsinwar, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini, Advocate.
For the State: Mr. Piyush Kumar, Public Prosecutor.
For the Respondent No.2:Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Advocate.
JUDGMENT
1. - Aggrieved by the order dated 26.5.2012 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deeg, District Bharatpur and by the order dated 25.9.2012 passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge No.1, Deeg, District Bharatpur, the petitioners have approached this court. By the former order, the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance against the petitioners for offences under Sections 302 and 201 read with 34 IPC. By the latter order, the learned Judge has dismissed the revision petition filed by the petitioners challenging the cognizance order.
2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that one Smt. Angoori filed a criminal complaint before the learned Magistrate against the petitioners. In the complaint she claimed that on 30.8.2009 at 9.00 PM, Kartar (petitioner No.1 before this court) came to her house and asked her the whereabouts of Raman, her son. For, Kartar wanted Raman to plough his field. She told Kartar that since her son just had his dinner, he could not go with him. She told him that his son will come to his farm in the morning and plough the field. However, Kartar did not listen to her. He told her that he is taking her son and would drop him back
Click Here to Read the rest of this document