RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
Sunil Kumar Garg, J.
Jeth Mal - Appellant
Versus
Swaroop Raj. and Ors. - Respondent
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 209 of 2002.
Decided On : 3-08-2004
Eviction - Shop Tenancy - The court confirmed the eviction of the appellant-defendant from the shop in question, but granted time until 30.11.2005 for the appellant-defendant to vacate and hand over the possession of the shop to the respondents-plaintiffs, subject to specific conditions.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant-defendant filed a second appeal against the judgment and decree allowing the eviction of the appellant-defendant from the shop in question.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the findings on personal and bona fide necessity were not legally infirm and confirmed the eviction. However, the court granted time until 30.11.2005 for the appellant-defendant to vacate and hand over the possession of the shop to the respondents-plaintiffs, subject to specific conditions.
Issues: The main issue was the eviction of the appellant-defendant from the shop in question.
Ratio Decidendi: The court confirmed the eviction but exercised discretion by granting time for the appellant-defendant to vacate and hand over the possession of the shop to the respondents-plaintiffs, subject to specific conditions.
Final Decision: The second appeal filed by the appellant-defendant was dismissed, confirming the eviction, but the appellant-defendant was granted time until 30.11.2005 to vacate and hand over the possession of the shop to the respondents-plaintiffs, subject to specific conditions.
Accordingly, this second appeal filed by the appellant-defendant is dismissed after confirming the judgment and decree dated 16.7.2002 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge No. 1, Jodhpur allowing the appeal of the plaintiffs-respondents and setting aside the judgment and order of learned Addl. Civil Judge (JD) No. 2, Jodhpur dated 24.9.1999 and decreeing the suit filed by the plaintiffs-respondents against appellant-defendant for eviction from shop in question.
However, the appellant-defendant is granted time upto 30.11.2005 to vacate and hand over the possession of the shop in question to the respondents-plaintiffs and this liberty of handing over the possession of the shop in question to the respondents-plaintiffs upto 30.11.2005 shall be subject to fulfilling the following conditions by the appellant-defendant:-
(i) That the appellant-defendant shall furnish an undertaking duly supported by an affidavit within 15 days from today in the Court of Addl. District Judge No. 1, Jodhpur to the effect:
(a) that he shall vacate and hand over the possession of the shop in question to the respondents-plaintiffs upto 30.11.2005 positively without any hindrance;
(b) that during that period, he shall not make any addition or alteration in the shop in question;
(c) that he shall not cause any damage to the shop in question;
(d) that he shall not sub-let or part with the possession or alienate the shop in question to any body else;
(e) that till vacation and handing over the possession of the shop in question to the respondents-plaintiffs, he shall continue to pay rent of the shop in question regularly without any fault.
*******
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.