SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Raj) 1273

RAJESH BALIA, O.P.BISHNOI
Saved Imran Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - Mr. B.M. Bohra appears for all the respondents. Service is complete.

2. At the request of learned counsel for the parties. we have heard the appeal on merit.

3. The petitioner-appellant applied for compassionate appointment after the death of his father late Shri Saved Razan Ali in the year 1999. He has made an application for appointment on 5.4.1999. The applicant's application was rejected on the ground that spouse of the deceased was already in Government service, therefore, no second employment in the family is permissible by way of compassionate appointment. The contention of the to learned counsel for the petitioner-appellant is that the spouse of deceased father who was in service, was second wife and step another of the applicant and, therefore, he was not the member of the family of Smt. Nishi @ Rohtagi Nishita Begum being in Government employment who was wife of deceased at the time of deceased.

4. We do not find any error in the finding of the learned Single Judge because the spouse of the deceased is already in service and therefore, no other dependent could be offered appointment on compassionate ground. Moreover, it has also been noticed that when an applic




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top