SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Raj) 1753

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
Ashok Parihar, J.
Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Anti Evasion, Zone - Appellant
Versus
M/s. Siremick Industries - Respondent
S.B. Sales Tax Revision Petition No. 139 of 2008.
Decided On : 25-03-2008

Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. J.M. Saxena, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Vivek Singhal, Advocate.

The court emphasized the importance of assessment by a competent authority and granted the department the liberty to rectify the assessment by issuing fresh notices.

Headnote:

Competent Authority - Tax Assessment - The court set aside the assessment order passed by an incompetent authority and granted the department the liberty to issue fresh notices for assessment by a competent authority.

Fact of the Case:

The assessing authority's order was set aside by the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tax Board due to being passed by an incompetent authority.

Finding of the Court:

The court granted the department the liberty to issue fresh notices for assessment by a competent authority.

Issues: Competency of the assessing authority and the power of the appellate authority to transfer matters for fresh assessment.

Ratio Decidendi: The assessment order was set aside due to being passed by an incompetent authority, and the department was granted the liberty to issue fresh notices for assessment by a competent authority.

Final Decision: The revision petition was disposed of with liberty to the department to issue fresh notices for assessment by a competent authority.

JUDGMENT

1. - The order of the assessing authority has been set aside by the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) as also the Rajasthan Tax Board only on the ground that the assessment order has been passed by an authority not competent to do so. Though the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) transferred the matter back for a fresh assessment to the competent authority, however, the above directions by the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) have been set aside by the Tax Board on the ground that the appellate authority had no powers or justification to transfer such matters.

2. After having considered entire facts and circumstances, since the assessment order has been set aside only on the ground that the same has been passed by an incompetent authority, the liberty should have been given by the Tax Board to the department for issuing fresh notices in accordance with law to the party for the relevant year if the department so chooses.

3. Accordingly, the revision petition is disposed of with liberty to the department to issue fresh notices to the respondent for the assessment of the year in question by a competent authority in accordance with law, however, the respondent is always free to raise legal objections including the issue of limitation if any such notice is now issued by the authority concerned.Revision Disposed of as above.

*******


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top