SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Raj) 1751

SHIV KUMAR SHARMA, GUMAN SINGH
Jaipur Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Pushpalata Rana – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants:Mr. Sanjay Pareek, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. M.K. Shah, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - The respondent came to be appointed on the post of Librarian with effect from December 22, 1983 on a consolidated salary of Rs. 400/- per month on temporary basis after her due selection by the selection committee pursuant to the advertisement issued by the Jaipur Development Authority (JDA). The respondent joined her services on January 6, 1984. The services of the respondent were extended from time to time upto December 31, 1989. Thereafter no written order was passed to extend her services and her services were terminated vide order dated July 30, 1990, w.e.f. August 4, 1990. The order was served on the respondent on September 6, 1990 when she went to resume her duties after her recovery from typhoid. The respondent assailed the order dated July 30, 1990 by filing writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. Learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition vide order dated February 18, 1999. Against this order of the learned Single Judge, the JDA has preferred this intra court appeal. The appeal got admitted and vide interim order dated February 12, 2001, the operation of the order dated July 30, 1990 of the learned Single Judge was kept in abeyance.

2. We hav









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top