SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Raj) 1762

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
Shiv Kumar Sharma, Guman Singh, JJ.
Mahesh @ Hari - Appellant
Versus
The State of Rajasthan - Respondent
D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1371 of 03.
Decided On : 26-03-2008

Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. Anurag Sharma, Advocate.
For the State: Mr. Ashvini Sharma, Public Prosecutor.

The central legal point established in the judgment is the scrutiny of witness testimony, the double-edged nature of enmity as a motive for the crime or false implication, and the evaluation of evidence based on the guidelines of the Hon'ble Apex Court.

Headnote:

Enmity - Criminal Law - Indian Penal Code - Section 302, Section 299 Cr.P.C. - The court discussed the essence of the legal framework applied by scrutinizing the testimony of witnesses with anxious care, the double-edged nature of enmity as a motive for the crime or false implication, and the evaluation of evidence based on the guidelines of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Anil Rai (supra).

Fact of the Case:

The appellant challenged the judgment convicting him under Section 302 IPC for causing the death of the deceased. The prosecution's case was based on eyewitness testimony and the appellant's defense of false implication due to enmity.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the death to be homicidal in nature and evaluated the testimony of witnesses with anxious care, concluding that the prosecution had successfully proved the guilt of the appellant beyond reasonable doubt.

Issues: The issues revolved around the credibility of eyewitness testimony, the appellant's defense of false implication due to enmity, and the evaluation of evidence based on the guidelines of the Hon'ble Apex Court.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the scrutiny of witness testimony, the double-edged nature of enmity as a motive for the crime or false implication, and the evaluation of evidence based on the guidelines of the Hon'ble Apex Court.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence awarded to the appellant under Section 302 IPC were maintained.

JUDGMENT

1. - In this appeal, appellant has challenged the judgment dated 6.9.2003 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast-Track) No.1, Jhalawar, whereby appellant Mahesh @ Hari was convicted and sentenced as under :

U/s. 302 IPC :

Imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default to further suffer imprisonment for one month.

2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case is that a written report of the incident was handed over on September 9, 1996 at 1.35 A.M. by the informant Bhikam Chand Yadav, to Shankar Lal, Sub- Inspector, at S.R.G. Hospital, Jhalawar. In the report it was reported that the informant resided in front of Sonic Bread Shop, at Mangalpura, Jhalawar. On intervening night of Sunday and Monday, at 1.00 A.M. in the night on 30.9.1996, his son Pradeep alongwith his friends Rajeshwar Chaturvedi and Vijay Sen were returning home on scooter from Hospital, where they had gone for dressing. The informant and his brother Narendra were waiting for Pradeep in the market, downstairs of their house. Pradeep alongwith Vijay Sen and Rajeshwar Chaturvedi then came and stopped the scooter in front of the shop. With this, in no time a Jeep RJ 17 T 0018 came from the side of Mastan Singh's shop, it stopped and Mahesh alias Hari s/o Shankar Lal and driver Gopal, got down from the jeep. Mahesh had a sword in his hand, Gopal exhorted him to kill Pradeep saying that he (Pradeep) had caused sword injury on his hand; don't leave him alive. On this, Mahesh alias Hari inflicted a sword blow on front side of Pradeep's neck with the intention to kill him, resulting in cutting his throat which caused him to fall down. On trying to save him (sic), Mahesh and Gopal fled in the jeep towards Bus Stand. Pradeep, who was lying in pool of blood was then taken to the Police Station on scooter and from there he was taken to Hospital in jeep. Pradeep was declared dead by the doctor at the Hospital. On this report, a case under Section 302/34 IPC was registered and investigation commenced. During the investigation, autopsy on the dead body was got conducted, necessary memos were prepared and the challan against accused Mahesh @ Hari, Gopal and Aslam was filed under Section 299 Cr.P.C. as they were absconding. Then on their surrender in Court on dated 9.2.1998, and on case being committed, the case came up for trial before the Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.1, Jhalawar.

3. The prosecution examined as many as 21 witnesses in support of its case. The statements of the accused were recorded under Section 313 Cr.P.C. In his explanation, appellant Mahesh @ Hari stated that the eye-witnesses examined were persons of criminal background and he was falsely implicated due to enmity as the deceased Pradeep made a deadly attack, which injured his hand at the paw so he was unable to hold a sword. One witness in defence was, however, examined. Learned trial Judge on hearing final submissions acquitted accused Gopal and Aslam, while convicted the appellant Mahesh @ Hari as indicated here-in-above.

4. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and with their assistance scanned the material on record. Learned counsel for the appellant argued that the appellant has been falsely implicated due to enmity as the deceased Pradeep had made a deadly assault on the appellant wherein paw of his hand was injured and the appellant could not grip the sword as alleged by the prosecution.

5. Death of Pradeep Kumar was undeniably homicidal in nature. As per post mortem report (Ex.P.17), following ante mortem injuries were found on the body:

Injury No. 1

Clear Cut, Transverse Incised wound 6" x 3'' up to cervical vertebrae (grievous-sharp weapons).
On autopsy of the dead body, the following muscles, veins and arteries, were cut on left side of neck :

1. Muscles :

(1) Platys ma muscles.

(2) Muscle sterno cleidomastoid

(3) Muscle Sterno hyoidclimus

(4) Muscle cartilage zyredica

(5) Cartilage cricodiea

2. Oesophagus and trachea are cut

3.























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top