VINEET KOTHARI
Vadhumal Kanhaiyalal – Appellant
Versus
Hemchand – Respondent
(i) Whether the suit filed on 6.7.1976 on the ground of non-payment of rent was not pre-mature?
(ii) Whether in view of the facts found by the Courts below, it can be legally said that the tenant had sub-let the premises in dispute or had parted with the possession thereof? and
(iii) Whether in view of the fact that Dr. Poonam Chand son of one of the plaintiffs having been employed in the Government service, the decree-for eviction on the ground of personal requirement can be sustained?
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.