SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Raj) 1936

R.M.LODHA, R.S.CHAUHAN
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Subhash Chand Sharma – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners:Sandeep Pathak , Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - Subhash Chand Sharma-respondent No. 1 herein approached the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act. In his application, he prayed that down gradation of the remarks in the Annual Performance Appraisal Reports of the applicant for the year 1996-97 be declared illegal and that the authorities be directed to completely ignore the down gradation of such remarks and to treat the applicant as 'outstanding' or 'very good' in the year 1996-97. He also prayed that the authorities (respondents therein) be directed to reconvene the meeting of the screening committee for appointment to Indian Forest Service and by reconvening such screening committee, the vacancies of each year may kindly be directed to be redetermined separately and after redetermination of year-wise vacancies, a further direction may be issued to convene meeting of the screening committee for each year separately. He further prayed that the authorities may be directed to give future promotions to him considering him in the category of 'outstanding' or 'very good'.

2. The respondent No. 1 initially joined Rajasthan Forest Subordinate Service. He











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top