1. - Challenge in this criminal misc. petition is to the order dated 6th of May, 2008 rendered by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track (Court No. 2), Jaipur City, Jaipur whereby the learned court has rejected the application of the petitioner accused with regard to the supply of a copy of a document.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the impugned order of the trial court.

3. From the factual matrix in this case, it is revealed that a sketch map was produced by the prosecution in the court on 6th May, 2008 when PW-18 Hemant, an army expert was produced in the witness box to tender his evidence. It is found that the counsel for the accused having raised the objection prayed the court that a copy of this document be made available to him which was duly turned down by the impugned order of the trial court.

4. From the perusal of the impugned order it is found that two documents which were tendered in evidence on 6th of May, 2008, have been exhibited as Ex.34 and Article 10. Needless to say, the moment the documents are exhibited, they become admissible in evidence. It is a well settled principle of criminal law