SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 3229

N.P.GUPTA
Om Parkash Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Manoj Kumar Choudhary, Advocate.
For the Respondent: B.L. Avasthi and PP.

JUDGMENT

1. - By this petition, the petitioners seek to quash the prosecution pending against them in the Court of addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajgarh, District Alwar in the Criminal Case No. 5/97 for the offence under Section 29(1) (a) of the Insecticides Act, 1968.

2. The facts are that on 21.3.1995 sample of BHC 10% of batch No. B-550, date of manufacture being July 1994, expiring in June 1996 was taken from M/s. Kisan Seva Kendra. This sample was sent for analysis to State Pesticides Testing Laboratory, Durgapura, whereupon it was found to be misbranded. Then the Dy. Director, Agriculture issued a show cause notice on 23.6.1995, which was replied on 3.7.1995, and it was specifically requested therein that the sample be sent to Central Insecticide Laboratory for retesting as per Section 24(3) and 24(4) of the Act, for the purpose of adducing evidence in controvertion of the testing report. However, nothing was done, and the complaint was filed on 7.1.1997, i.e., after expiry of the shelf life of the substance. It is contended that in view of positive request having been made under Section 24(3) and (4) for reanalyse of the sample by the Central Laboratory, at a time when the





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top