1. - In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges the order dated, September 23, 1995 of the Director, Computer, Rajasthan Jaipur. In fact, this is second inning in the matter.

2. In order to appreciate the controversy involved in this petition, necessary facts may be narrated. Vide advertisement No. 1/91, applications were invited for different posts including 20 posts of Data Entry Operator. Out of the same, four posts were to be filled in from general category. The appointments were to he made on urgent/temporary basis for a period of six months or till the duly selected candidates were made available by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission. The petitioner was one of the applicants. It appears that the selections were not made pursuant to the said advertisement on the ground that the Rajasthan Computer State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1992 came into force in the mean time. Cancelling the aforesaid advertisement, fresh advertisement No. 1/93-94 was issued and the petitioner against submitted his application for the post of Data Entry Operator. By the time, subsequent advertisement No. 1/93-94 came to be published, the p