SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Raj) 1519

MOHD.YAMIN
Tara Singh – Appellant
Versus
Chiman Lal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - This is a revision against the order of learned Additional District Judge, Srikaranpur dated 19.5.1999 by which he decreed the suit filed by Chimanlal against Tara Singh and Kapoor Singh under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act.

2. Briefly stated, Chimanlal's case is that shop No. 47 was situated in Dhan Mandi, Srikaranpur. Commission Agents' business was being carried under the name and style of Pohumal Madanlal since 1984 in this shop. The business was being carried by partners Madanlal and Balkishan. Its management was being done by Madanlal partner and he was in possession of the shop. This business was closed in the year 1991 and possession of the shop was handed over by Madanlal to Smt. Premlata who was the wife as well as power of attorney holder of Balkishan. Possession of the shop was in turn given to plaintiff Chimanlal on 26.1.991 by Smt. Premlata under an agreement made between the two. It was further averred in the plaint that 90 bags of gwar gum, a refrigerator, sofa set and other articles were lying in the shop which belong to firm Pohumal Madanlal. It was alleged that on 3.3.1991 defendants Tara Singh, Kapoor Singh along with 15-20 persons armed with












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top