SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Raj) 2353

VINEET KOTHARI
Ram Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Anil kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. N.K. Rastogi, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - Heard learned counsel.

2. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 13.5.2008 whereby the learned trial court rejected the application of the defendant under Order 14 Rule 5 Civil Procedure Code. seeking additional issues in the money recovery suit filed by the plaintiff against him. The learned counsel for the petitioner-defendant urged that the learned trial court could not have refused the said application merely because the same was filed at the stage of defendant's evidence and also because the issues framed by the trial court were only pertaining to cash deposited by the defendant and not with the cheque transactions with Shambhu & Company, the firm of the father of defendant.

3. Having heard learned counsel, this Court finds that the learned trial court has not committed any error in rejecting the application under Order 14 Rule 5 Civil Procedure Code. because the additional issues sought by the defendants are already covered by the issues framed by the learned trial court on which the plaintiff has led his evidence. Whatever the defendant has said in the application under Order 14 Rule 5 Civil Procedure Code. is a matter of his defence and the evide



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top